During each forming simulation process, the forces required to form the metal are being calculated. It is possible to output (for each piece of tooling in each process) the forces experienced and required to form the sheet metal.
This is vital information at the early stage of a sheet metal tooling project, when it is important that the required tonnages are understood, to ensure appropriate production equipment (press machines) are available.
Tonnages outputed from the forming simulation are MINIMUM requirements and some allowance should be added (eg: 20%) to allow for press machine inefficiencies and other mechancial energy losses.

In order to perform a sheet metal forming simulation, die face data is required. This data can be initially provided by the client (in the case of SimulateLite) OR is created as part of the SimulateComplete service.
The client can select to receive the final die face data as used in the simulation, whether it be ADJUSTED die face data (including adjustments or changes needed to countermeasure problems) OR the die face data created by the Engineers at StampingSimulation.com
The die face data can be used in a real tool build, to create the surfaces of the tool exactly as they were simulated. This is the best way to ensure the simulated result can be produced at first tool tryout. The surfaces are provided as 3D IGS CAD data.
Developed blank shape provided as IGS data:

This output should be "required" when the client needs an accurate blank shape development through the forming process. The end result is an IGS file containing the developed blank outline and can be used for first try blank development.
In many cases, the development will be accurate enough to be considered "final" however, it is always recommended that a laser cut or proto cut blank is trialed first from this data. A blanking tool should not be cut directly from this data!
The difference between this result and a one step result, is that the entire forming process is considered, stage by stage. This means if the actual tool build matches the process simulated, this blank development will be very accurate in reality.
Springback analysis and resulting color error map:

This output should be "required" when the client is concerned about springback being a problem after the sheet metal is formed. This output predicts the MAGNITUDE and DIRECTION of springback.
The result is shown as a color error map using a scale showing magnitude, in a JPG format.
Springback compensated die face data as IGS:

Springback is a well known sheet metal problem. Using simulation technology, springback can be predicted to a reasonable degree of accuracy and then compensation can be made. Clients whom have requested "Springback analysis and resulting color error map" can choose to go an extra step, by "requiring" this option and having their die face design compensated for springback.
The end result is a die face design that has allowance for springback already built in.
Formal report of all requested outputs:

Although each simulation job always has an AVI output showing tooling, formability and thinning (when appropriate), the option to have all the results summarized in a formal report is also available.
A formal report is useful when presenting simulation results to your customer when it may not be possible or appropriate to view an AVI file OR when you need to present formally on paper during a tool design meeting.
Reports are issued in XLS or PDF format.
Other:
| | |
| Circle Grid Plot | Surface Defect Height Plot |
| | |
| Material Strains as 3D Vectors | Simulated Die Faces as CAD |